Melissa officinalis (leaf)

From AHPA Botanical Identity References Compendium
Revision as of 20:49, 7 July 2015 by Admin (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

AHPA recognizes other valuable resources exist regarding the identity of Melissa officinalis.

To submit a suggestion or contribution, please contact Merle Zimmermann.

Contents

Nomenclature

Melissa officinalis L.   Lamiaceae  
Standardized common name (English): lemon balm

Botanical Voucher Specimen

bottomright bottomright

Melissa officinalis Tropicos 100007389 (S).jpg
Source: MOBOT, Tropicos.org[1]

Melissa officinalis Kew barcode=K000914345 573258.jpg
Source: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.[2]

Organoleptic Characteristics

[Melissa officinalis (leaf):] Fragrant (fragrance of lemons), aromatic, astringent, bitter.

Source: Culbreth, D. (1917) A Manual of Materia Media and Pharmacology, 6th ed. [3]

[Melissa officinalis] is lemon scented.

Source: American Medicinal Plants of Commercial Importance (1930) [4]

Macroscopic Characteristics

Perennial herb ... stems several, quadrangular, 0.3-1 M. (1-3°) high, branched at base, pubescent; flowers yellowish-white, purplish, calyx 5-toothed, tubular, bell-shaped; corolla bilabiate, 4 stamens.

Leaves, 5 Cm. (2') long, petiolate, ovate, obtuse, crenate, hairy, glandular, branches square ... contains volitile oil 25 p.c., bitter principle, tannin, gum.

Source: Culbreth, D. (1917) A Manual of Materia Media and Pharmacology, 6th ed. [5]

This plant is 1 to 2 1/2 feet high, is covered with fine hair, and has a rather stout, erect, or much-branched stem. The round-toothed, egg-shaped or heart-shaped leaves are from 1 to 2 1/2 inches long and arranged opposite one another on the stem. From June to August the white or cream-colored tube shaped flowers up to two-thirds of an inch long appear, several to a cluster, in the axils of the leaves.

Source: American Medicinal Plants of Commercial Importance (1930) [6]

bottomright bottomright

PlantaPhile - 174.jpg
Source: PlantaPhile[7]

PlantaPhile - 1914.jpg
Source: PlantaPhile[8]

Microscopic Characteristics

High Performance Thin Layer Chromatographic Identification

HPTLC-assoc-Logo-farbig-Text-schwarz-300x47.png
(thumbnail)
Melissa leaf dry extract (leaf) HPTLC ID - NP reagent, UV 366 nm

Melissa leaf dry extract (leaf) (Melissa officinalis)

Lane Assignments Lanes, from left to right (Track, Volume, Sample):

  1. 2 µL Rutin, hyperoside, rosmarinic acid (with increasing Rf)
  2. 2 µL Melissa leaf dry extract 1
  3. 2 µL Melissa leaf dry extract 2
  4. 2 µL Melissa leaf dry extract 3
  5. 2 µL Melissa leaf dry extract 4
  6. 2 µL Melissa leaf dry extract 5 (adulterated with Peppermint leaf)
  7. 2 µL Melissa leaf dry extract 6
  8. 2 µL Peppermint leaf dry extract
  9. 2 µL Melissa leaf 1
  10. 2 µL Melissa leaf 2
  11. 2 µL Melissa leaf 3
  12. 2 µL Melissa leaf 4
  13. 2 µL Melissa leaf 5
  14. 2 µL Peppermint leaf 

Reference Sample(s) Reference: Dissolve 1 mg of hyperoside, 1 mg of rutin and 5 mg of rosmarinic acid individually in 10 mL of methanol. 

Stationary Phase Stationary phase, i.e. Silica gel 60, F254 

Mobile Phase Formic acid, water, ethyl acetate 1:1:15 (v/v/v) 

Sample Preparation Method Sample: Mix 0.2 g of extract with 5 mL of methanol and sonicate for 5 minutes, then centrifuge or filter the solutions and use the supernatants / filtrates as test solutions. Optional: Mix 0.5 g of dried Melissa leaf with 5 mL methanol and proceed as above.

Derivatization reagent: NP reagent, Preparation: 1 g of natural products reagent in 200 mL of ethyl acetate; 2.) PEG reagent, Preparation: 10 g of polyethylene glycol 400 in 200 mL of methylene chloride, Use: Heat plate for 3 min at 100°C, dip (time 0, speed 5) in NP reagent, dry and dip (time 0, speed 5) in PEG reagent, dry in air. 

Detection Method Saturated chamber; developing distance 70 mm from lower edge; relative humidity 33% 

Other Notes Images presented in this entry are examples and are not intended to be used as basis for setting specifications for quality control purposes.

System suitability test: Rutin: yellow fluorescent zone Rf ~ 0.09; Hyperoside: yellow fluorescent zone at Rf ~ 0.25; Rosmarinic acid: light blue fluorescent zone at Rf ~ 0.74.

Identification: Compare result with reference images. The fingerprint of the test solution is similar to that of the corresponding botanical reference sample. Additional weak zones may be present. The chromatogram of the test solution shows a light blue fluorescent zone just below the position of reference hyperoside. At the position of rosmarinic acid there is an intense light blue fluorescent zone. Between this zone and reference hyperoside there are two bluoe fluorescent zones (green arrows).

Test for other species: No yellow zones are seen below the position of reference hyperoside (pink arrow, Peppermint dry extract).


Source: HPTLC Association [9]

Supplementary Information

Sources

  1. MOBOT, Tropicos.org http://www.tropicos.org/Image/100007389
  2. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. http://specimens.kew.org/herbarium/K000914345
  3. Culbreth, D. (1917) A Manual of Materia Media and Pharmacology, 6th ed.
  4. American Medicinal Plants of Commercial Importance (1930)
  5. Culbreth, D. (1917) A Manual of Materia Media and Pharmacology, 6th ed.
  6. American Medicinal Plants of Commercial Importance (1930)
  7. PlantaPhile http://plantaphile.com/
  8. PlantaPhile http://plantaphile.com/
  9. HPTLC Association http://www.hptlc-association.org/
Personal tools
MediaWiki Appliance - Powered by TurnKey Linux